29 August 2012

Simply sign in

Making users register or 'Sign up' to their service is the biggest hurdle faced by websites and on-line services.

In his book book Designing for Social Web Joshua Porter broadly classifies the stages through which users pass in the usage lifecycle of a software. The five stages starting at being 'unaware' to becoming a 'Passionate user' can be attributed to user engagement with sites as well. From not knowing much about what is being offered, to becoming a avid user, relying on the site and feeling confident using it - users unknowingly pass through these stages. The five stages mentioned are : Unaware, interested, first time user, regular user and passionate user.

In this user lifecycle, the most critical step is 'sign-up' where interested user is converted to a registered user of the site. If the site can  successfully navigate this step, the site can expect to engage user and with some good user experience, a user commitment is not difficult to achieve.

From a user perspective, this is the most critical step, as sites often require users to enter secure and confidential information. Lack of trust and fear of spamming are the main reasons which hold users from signing in.

Pocket 's  'Sign-up' screen has a immediate appeal for being simple yet efficient. Only three clearly labelled fields, which no need to confirm email or password. This is the best 'sign-up' I have seen in some time. Twitter 'sign-up' is also similar asking user to enter only three details. The only reason I rate this better than twitter is, the label 'Full Name' is often confusing for user. For most user, full name would mean they need to enter a prefix, first name and last name. Years of experience in filling out forms in the web has thought most users a blank space in a form often returns a error message. Besides, there is the issue of middle name being a part of the full name. So the term 'full name' is not as simple as it sounds. 'Pocket' approach of asking for a 'username' is less confusing and as most web users have adopted a user name they use for on-line applications, this is more convenient.

6 May 2010

UK Election 2010 on google

United Kingdom is voting today, and this is being called the most fiercely contested election which may see country go through sea changes.
As there are speculations of a hung parliament, it will be interesting to see who makes it to 10 Downing street.
I liked google UK logo today which had the 10 Downing, and not the cliche of a ballet box. Good representation of the main focus of the day.

12 February 2010

Video explaining IA

This video explains what is information architecture and sums it up very nicely.

explaining information architecture from Dan Klyn on Vimeo.

8 July 2009

What's in a NAME

Name fields are often considered the most obvious and simple fields in a form. After all you have a first name a second name and you may have a middle name. So what can be so complicating about that? Consider designing a form which will be used by people across countries and cultures and complexity of names becomes evident.
I was recently designing a form which was to work well across all South-East Asian countries and cultures. As the information collected would be used for financial purpose, little (unintentional) discrepancy would mean problem for the bank in validating the user's identity. It could also mean bad user experience, if the bank had to ask user for verification of identity after user had filled in the form honestly. In Personal Names Around the World Richard Ishida lists down how the basic structure of a name changes across different cultures.
The Name Riddle defines the problem and suggest a two solutions.
The first solution proposes one single field for the entire name, followed by a field asking for user for the name to be used to address him/ her. I however strongly feel that second field label which reads 'Address', can be very misleading. I would prefer to go with 'short name' for the label and add instruction explaining what it means purpose of the short name. There is also the question of if both the fields should be made mandatory? Making the short name mandatory will mean users with single name will have to enter the same name twice. However if it is not mandatory, most people are likely to skip this field leaving the system with only the long name to address the user. My recommendation is to make the field mandatory only a shorter name is needed to address the user.


The second solution is more in line with the widely prevalent web forms, having two fields, for 'Given Names(s)' and 'Family Name'. This gives user the option to enter more than one name as 'Given Name'.
One field for the full name, as proposed in the first solution appeared a good solution. This however is a deviation from the predominant convention practised in web. The second solution is best suited for cultures and countries where English is the dominant language, but I am certain that this will not work very well in non-English cultures.

22 June 2009

Advertising user experience

A couple of recent adverts in TV caught my attention. These adverts choose to speak of their services not mentioning the products. They championed user experience and promote it, almost deliberately ignoring the product range. The adverts I am talking about are of
Aviva and confused.com.

Aviva
The new TV commercial of Aviva is strikingly different from the run of the mill insurance adverts. In the full length of the advert, there is no mention of any insurance products, options, plans or schemes. In simple words like "remember me", "just recognise me", "don't clutter your language with corporate jargon", the advertisement claims placing customer experience over the main products. The message "a company being built around you" sums it up very nicely. Evidently this is one company where services take priority over products, or at least they claim to be doing so in the commercial.


Confused.com

This commercial revolves around functionality and usability of the web site - confused.com a financial products comparison site. The somewhat unimpressive video shows users using the site and recounting their positive experience. They also mention that the site helped them save money by helping them find financial products of their choice at a lower cost. The gist of the commercial is that the site, by being more usable, helps people find cheaper options. Again the user experience takes priority over the range of products to compare from.


This kept me wondering if we were witnessing the shaping up of 'Experience economy'. What has to be evaluated is how 'Real Real' these companies are in reality.